Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (227)

(229) next ›››

(228)
220 A CRITICAL DISSERTATION
" them behind the wood, and tried the
*' flrength of our arms in the empty air."
Ofuan is always concHe in his defcrip-
tions, which adds much to their beauty and
force. For it is a great mirtake to ima-
gine, that a crowd of particulars, or a very
full and extended ftyle, is of advantage to
defcription. On the contrary, fuch a dif-
fufe manner for the moft part weakens it.
Any one redundant circumrtance is a nui-
fance. It encumbers and loads the fancy,
and renders the main image indiflin61. " Ob-
*' flat," as Quintilian fays with regard to
Hyle, " quicquid noi) adjuvat." To be
concife in defcription, is one thing ; and to
be general, is another. No defcription
that refts in generals can poflibly be good ;
it can convey no lively idea ; for it is of
particulars only that we have a diftindl con-
ception. But, at the fame time, no ftrong
imagination dwells long upon any one par-
ticular ; or heaps together a mafs of trivial
ones. By the happy choice of feme one,
or of a few that are the moft ftriking, it
prefents the image more complete, fhows
us more at one glance, than a feeble ima-
gination is able to do, by turning its ob-
ject round and round into a variety of lights.
Tacitus is of all profe writers the molt
concife. He has even a degree of abrupt-
nefs vefembling our author : Yet no writer
is more eminent for lively defcription.

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence