Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (173)

(175) next ›››

(174)
1 66 A CRITICAL DISSERTATION
is not, in every little particular, exaflly
conformable to the practice of Homer and
Virgil, were the mere fquearaiflinefs and
pedantry of criticifm. Examined even ac-
cording to Ariftotle's rules, it will be found
to have all the effential requifites of a true
and regular epic j and to have feveral of
them in fo high a degree, as at firft view to
raife our afconllhraent on finding OlTian's
compofition fo agreeable to rules of which
he was entirely ignorant. But our aftonifh-
ment will ceafe, when we confider from
what fource Ariftotle drew thofe rules. Ho-
mer knew no more of the laws of criticifm
than Oflian ; but, guided by nature, he
compofed in verfe a regular ftory, founded
on heroic actions, which all poiierity ad-
mired. Ariftotle, with great fagacity and
penetration, traced the caufes of this ge-
neral admiration. He obferved what it was
in Horaer's compofition, and in the conduft
of his ftory, which gave it fuch power to
pieafe ; from this obfervation he deduced
the rules which pbets ought to follow, who
would write and pleafe like Homer j and to
a compofition formed according to fuch
rules, he gave the name of an epic poem.
Plence his whole fyftem arofe. Ariftotle
ftudied nature in Homer. Homer and Of-
fian both wrote from nature. No wonder
that among ail the three, there ftiould be
iuch agreement and conformity.

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence