Hew Morrison Collection > Adhamh agus Eubh, no Craobh Sheanachais nan Gàël

CELTIC LANGUAGE. 199
setting history at defiance. By no means. We
are duly aware tliat the Phcenicians and the people
called in Scripture Canaanites, are one and the
same, and that they are said to be the descendants,
not of Japhet, but of Ham. That they are the
same people, no one wiU doubt who reflects that
Matthew, who wrote either in Hebrew or Syriac,
calls the same person a Canaanitish woman^ whom
Mark, writing in Greek, calls a Phoenician of
Syria. Of this, the following, from profane his-
tory, is pointedly corroborative, viz. : —
" The Bab^vlonians say," says Eupolemus, " that the first
was Belus ( Aub-El), who is the same as Cronus (Cù-Or-Ain).
And froin him descended Belus and Chanaan ( ^a««-Ain),
and tliis Chanaan was the father of the Phcenicians. Another
of his sons was Chum, who is called by the Greeks Asbolus
(Aish-Ob-El), the father of the Ethiopians, and the brother
of Mestraim, the father of the Egyptians."
Thus also Thallus : —
" Belus, the king ofthe Assyrians, and Cronus, the Titan,
made war against Zeus and his compeers, who are called
Gods. He says, moreover, that 'Gygus (Ogygus^ was smitten,
and fled to T«jT>j<r«-ov, Tartesson," v. Eus.
This is the Babylonian squabble, and the tract
of the Celtic wave.
But these preniises admitted, let us not forget
that Japhet and Ham are two brothers, brought
up together, and, therefore, speaking the same
language. Let us also bear in mind, that the