Medicine - Drugs > Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1894-1895 > Volume I
(310) Page 276
Download files
Individual page:
Thumbnail gallery: Grid view | List view
276 REPORT OF THE INDIAN HEMP DRUGS COMMISSION, 1893-94. [CH. XIV.
(81) Kali Das Mukerji,
Sub-Deputy Collector: After advocating prohibi-
tion of ganja on the grounds of the evil effects, and stating that
there would
be no danger from the discontent caused owing to the small number
of the
consumers, the witness proceeds: "The reasons usually put forward
in favour
of ganja consumption are as follows: (1) that Hindu friars and
jogis cannot do
without it, for it helps them in their religious contemplation, and
sustains them
under severe exertion and exposure; (2) that it is a safeguard
against disease
in malarious tracts; and (3) that it serves the labouring classes
as a refreshing
stimulant, alleviating fatigue. I do not think that any of these
reasons is con-
clusive, though plausible. In fact, none of them stands the test of
close examin-
ation. If any intoxicating drug is at all necessary for friars and
jogis, alcohol,
opium, or siddhi may serve the purpose. Eight kinds of intoxicating
drugs are
prescribed in the Tantras for Hindu devotees, and it is optional
with them to
take any if they care to do
so at all................... That ganja is a safeguard
against disease in malarious
tracts is not necessarily true................... Even
as a stimulant and remover
of fatigue, ganja has very little to recommend it to
the labouring
classes................... A careful observation is sure to
establish
the fact that any ordinary
labourer whose only stimulant is tobacco is on the
whole a better workman than his ganja consuming
brother."
Opinions against
prohibition of
ganja in Bengal.
571. It is impossible to
quote the mass of opinion against prohibition of
ganja, but the following
analysis of some of the most
important opinions will give an idea of the strength
of these opinions:—
(1) Prohibition
impossible or unnecessary, or could not be enforced
with-
out a large preventive establishment.
(1) Hon'ble D. R. Lyall, C.S.I., Member, Board of Revenue.
(2) Mr. Westmacott, Commissioner.
(9) Mr. Price, Collector.
(11) Mr. Skrine, Collector.
(21) Mr. Jenkins, Collector.
(17) Mr. Gupta, Commissioner of Excise.
(46) Ganendra Nath Pal, Deputy Collector.
(197) Mr. H. M. Weatherall, Manager, Nawab's Estates, Tippera.
(2) Prohibition would
be strongly resented by religious mendicants, or
would be regarded as an interference with religion, or would
be likely to become a political
danger.
(1) Hon'ble D. R. Lyall, C.S.I., Member, Board of Revenue.
(3) Mr. Westmacott, Commissioner.
(19) Mr. Manisty, Collector.
(18) Mr. Hare, Collector.
(16) Mr. Marindin, Collector.
(32) Mr. Bedford, Deputy Commissioner.
Set display mode to: Large image | Zoom image | Transcription
Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated.
India Papers > Medicine - Drugs > Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1894-1895 > Volume I > (310) Page 276 |
---|
Permanent URL | https://digital.nls.uk/74574686 |
---|---|
Description | Chapter XIV, cont. |
Description | [Volume 1]: Report. |
---|---|
Attribution and copyright: |
|
More information |