Series 4 > William Melrose in China, 1845-1855
(242) Page 157
Download files
Complete book:
Individual page:
Thumbnail gallery: Grid view | List view
![(242) Page 157 -](https://deriv.nls.uk/dcn17/1276/9748/127697483.17.jpg)
157
1851
thought they would from your former calculation. But I am not
greatly disappointed as they still leave a good profit, and [I] made
allowances for your first statement in case the news was ‘ our gude
to be true’. In case I forget I will just say here that I have been trying
to get compensation for the articles missing.
You say you have put $20.80 or £4 15s. 4d. to my debit as that
amount is overcharged in the invoice or, as you say, extended wrong.
On looking at my invoice book I find the amount extended just
the same as you state them to be in the invoice sent, and appear
quite correct, except
M 86.87 where, as you say, I have charged 12 sets of sieves
at 80 cents instead of 11 sets - overcharge 80 cents - which is right.
You say M 85 is charged in the invoice $64.00 and should be
$63.00 and I see by the list of what you say was in it that I have
omitted to specify two caps at 50 cents or $1.00 which makes that
all right. Add two caps at 50 cents to $63.00 and you have $64.00.
M 135 you say is extended $140.00 and should be $122.00
(difference $18.00). You also specify the articles the box contains
and I see where the discrepancy is: the one set of chessmen you
specify as charged $2.00 should be $20.00, making exactly the
$18.00 difference.
So you will see that the only item which should really go to my
debit is 80 cents for the set of sieves, that really being a mistake in
the extension; the others were not mistakes in the extension, the
amounts being extended properly but from the articles not being
properly specified, the mistake occurred. So much for that!
I have got $24.00 compensation for the missing packages in M
parcel. I cannot get more, the camphor wood trunks etc. the China¬
men won’t allow at all and swear they were shipped. The $24.00
are allowed for the fans and images and the hat and cap which they
say might have been forgotten. In M 31, as you mentioned, I have
charged 12 pairs of jars too many and of course must allow you for
them. It should have been in the invoice 24 jars at $1.50 per pair,
and not 24 pairs as wrongly stated and extended. This being the
case, you will require to rub out the £4 15s. 4d. you have put to
my debit already and put instead of it, say:
overcharge on sieve 80 cents,
allowance by the Chinamen $24.00,
1851
thought they would from your former calculation. But I am not
greatly disappointed as they still leave a good profit, and [I] made
allowances for your first statement in case the news was ‘ our gude
to be true’. In case I forget I will just say here that I have been trying
to get compensation for the articles missing.
You say you have put $20.80 or £4 15s. 4d. to my debit as that
amount is overcharged in the invoice or, as you say, extended wrong.
On looking at my invoice book I find the amount extended just
the same as you state them to be in the invoice sent, and appear
quite correct, except
M 86.87 where, as you say, I have charged 12 sets of sieves
at 80 cents instead of 11 sets - overcharge 80 cents - which is right.
You say M 85 is charged in the invoice $64.00 and should be
$63.00 and I see by the list of what you say was in it that I have
omitted to specify two caps at 50 cents or $1.00 which makes that
all right. Add two caps at 50 cents to $63.00 and you have $64.00.
M 135 you say is extended $140.00 and should be $122.00
(difference $18.00). You also specify the articles the box contains
and I see where the discrepancy is: the one set of chessmen you
specify as charged $2.00 should be $20.00, making exactly the
$18.00 difference.
So you will see that the only item which should really go to my
debit is 80 cents for the set of sieves, that really being a mistake in
the extension; the others were not mistakes in the extension, the
amounts being extended properly but from the articles not being
properly specified, the mistake occurred. So much for that!
I have got $24.00 compensation for the missing packages in M
parcel. I cannot get more, the camphor wood trunks etc. the China¬
men won’t allow at all and swear they were shipped. The $24.00
are allowed for the fans and images and the hat and cap which they
say might have been forgotten. In M 31, as you mentioned, I have
charged 12 pairs of jars too many and of course must allow you for
them. It should have been in the invoice 24 jars at $1.50 per pair,
and not 24 pairs as wrongly stated and extended. This being the
case, you will require to rub out the £4 15s. 4d. you have put to
my debit already and put instead of it, say:
overcharge on sieve 80 cents,
allowance by the Chinamen $24.00,
Set display mode to:
Universal Viewer |
Mirador |
Large image | Transcription
Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated.
Scottish History Society volumes > Series 4 > William Melrose in China, 1845-1855 > (242) Page 157 |
---|
Permanent URL | https://digital.nls.uk/127697481 |
---|
Description | Over 180 volumes, published by the Scottish History Society, containing original sources on Scotland's history and people. With a wide range of subjects, the books collectively cover all periods from the 12th to 20th centuries, and reflect changing trends in Scottish history. Sources are accompanied by scholarly interpretation, references and bibliographies. Volumes are usually published annually, and more digitised volumes will be added as they become available. |
---|