• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

The Scottish Enlightenment

  • Home
  • Key
    People
    • James Adams
    • James Craig
    • Alexander Geddes
    • Henry Raeburn
    • John Ainslie
    • William Creech
    • John Home
    • Allan Ramsay
    • James Beattie
    • George Drummond
    • David Hume
    • William Shaw
    • Hugh Blair
    • Gilbert Elliot
    • Samuel Johnson
    • Thomas Sheridan
    • William Brodie
    • Adam Ferguson
    • Malcolm Laing
    • John Sinclair
    • James Burnett
    • Robert Fergusson
    • Henry Mackenzie
    • Adam Smith
    • Alexander Carlyle
    • Archibald Grant
    • James Macpherson
    • James Thomson
    • James Adams (1737-1802)
    • John Ainslie (1745-1828)
    • James Beattie (1735-1803)
    • Hugh Blair (1718-1800)
    • William Brodie, known as Deacon Brodie, (1746-1788)
    • James Burnett, Lord Monboddo (1714-1799)
    • Alexander Carlyle (1722-1805)
    • James Craig (1739-1795)
    • William Creech (1745-1815)
    • George Drummond (1687-1766)
    • Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto (1722-1777)
    • Adam Ferguson (1723-1816)
    • Robert Fergusson (1750-1774)
    • Sir Archibald Grant (1696-1778)
    • Alexander Geddes (1737-1802)
    • John Home (1722-1808)
    • David Hume (1711-1776)
    • Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
    • Malcolm Laing (1762-1818)
    • Henry Mackenzie (1745-1831)
    • James Macpherson (1736-1796)
    • Sir Henry Raeburn (1756-1823)
    • Allan Ramsay (1713-1784)
    • William Shaw (1749-1831)
    • Thomas Sheridan (1719-1788)
    • Sir John Sinclair (1754–1835)
    • Adam Smith (1723-1790)
    • James Thomson (1700-1748)
  • Town
    Planning
    • Source 1: A proposal for keeping the streets clean, 1734-5
    • Source 2: Proposals for improving the city of Edinburgh, 1752
    • Source 3: Proposals for improving the city of Edinburgh, 1752
    • Source 4: James Craig’s design for the New Town, 1768
    • Source 5: Map showing the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh, 1780
    • Source 6: James Craig’s proposal for improving the eastern approach to the Old Town, 1786
    • Source 7: Description of Edinburgh from the Statistical Account of Scotland, 1791-1799
  • Encyclopaedia
    Britannica
    • Source 1: Title page to volume 1 of the first edition.
    • Source 2: Agriculture, volume 1 A-B, page 40
    • Source 3: Agriculture Plate IV, volume 1 A-B, page 41
    • Source 4: Mechanics, volume 1 M-Z, page 38
    • Source 5: Mechanics, volume 1 M-Z, plate CV
    • Source 6: Camelus or Camel, volume 1 A-B, page 13
    • Source 7: Bactrianus or Bactrian Camel, volume 1 A-B, Plate EIX
    • Source 8: Caricature of Andrew Bell and William Smellie by John Kay
  • Scotticisms
    • Source 1 : A list of Scotticisms by David Hume, first printed 1752
    • Source 2 : Lectures on the art of speaking English, 1761
    • Source 3 : A society for promoting the reading and speaking of English, 1761
    • Source 4 : Observations on the Scottish dialect by Sir John Sinclair, 1782
    • Source 5 : Teaching correct English to the young, 1799
    • Source 6 : The richness of the Scots language, 1792
    • Source 7 : In support of the Scots language, 1799
  • Statistical
    Account
    • Source 1: Sir John Sinclair’s description of compiling the ‘Statistical Account’
    • Source 2: Sir John Sinclair’s discussion of the term ‘statistics’
    • Source 3: Part of the report for the Parish of Monymusk
    • Source 4: Part of the report for the Parish of Wick
    • Source 5: Statistical table for the Parish of Culross
    • Source 6: Report for the Parish of East Kilbride
    • Source 7: Report for the Parish of Smailholm
  • Ossian
    • Source 1: Preface to ‘Fragments of ancient poetry’, 1760
    • Source 2: Preface to ‘Fingal’, 1761
    • Source 3: Letter from David Hume, 1763
    • Source 4: Samuel Johnson’s opinion of the poems, 1775
    • Source 5: An enquiry into the authenticity of the poems, 1781
    • Source 6: ‘Poems of Ossian’ edited by Malcolm Laing, 1805
    • Source 7: Highland Society of Scotland report, 1805
  • Clubs and
    Societies
    • Source 1: List of members of the Select Society
    • Source 2: Questions debated by the Select Society
    • Source 3: The aims of the Edinburgh Society
    • Source 4: A description of the Philosophical Society of Edinburgh, 1754
    • Source 5: Members of the Cape Club
    • Source 6: An account of the Cape Club
    • Source 7: Extract from the Highland Society of London Minute Book, 1784
    • Women and the Enlightenment
  • Resources
    • Gallery

Ossian

Source 6 : ‘Poems of Ossian’, Volume 1, edited by Malcolm Laing, 1805

Printed book (NLS shelfmark: Oss.64-65)

Malcolm Laing was a historian and advocate from Orkney. He questioned the authenticity of the Ossian poems, and his 1805 edition, which included ‘Fingal’, ‘Temora’ and ‘Fragments of ancient poetry’, featured his extensive notes and annotations to the poems.

Related information at NLS

thumbnail of ossian-source-6

View full screen (opens in new tab or window)View the Transcript

Transcript

[page vi]

Instead of a formal dissertation on those marks of poetical imitation which a learned critick has so well explained [See Hurd on the Marks of Poetical Imitation], it is sufficient to observe, that in Ossian there are some hundred similes and poetical images, which must either be original, or derived from imitation.  If the poems are authentick, they must be original; and their casual coincidence with other poetry can possess only such a vague resemblance, as that of Virgil’s Pollio to the prophesies of Isaiah.  If the poems, however, are not authentick,

[page vii]

these similes and poetical images must be derived from the classicks, scriptures, and modern poetry, with which the author’s mind was previously impregnated, and, however artfully disguised, they may be traced distinctly to their source.

And conversely again, if these similes and poetical images are original, the authenticity of the poems can admit of no contradiction; if, on the contrary, they are derived from imitation, all the attestations and oaths in the Highlands would fail to establish the authenticity of Ossian.  The present commentary professes, therefore, not merely to exhibit parallel passages, much less instances of a fortuitous resemblance of ideas, but to produce the precise originals from which the similes and images are indisputably derived.

The arrangement of the three first editions is preserved, as the order in which the poems were written leads occasionally to some curious detections.  But the text of the [page viii]

corrected edition of 1773 is adopted throughout, and the additions are carefully marked and distinguished by Italics, though the alterations are too numerous and minute to be noted.  Not only Macpherson’s historical dissertations, but many of his notes, are rejected, as full of falsehood; and Blair’s critical dissertation is also omitted, as it can do no honour now to his memory.

In the course of my enquiries, I have discovered above four thousand of Macpherson’s verses, written between the age of seventeen and twenty-two, while he sacrificed, or served his apprenticeship in secret to the muses.  His earliest poem is in blank verse, and entitled Death; the second is a heroic poem, which may be stiled the Hunter; both written at the age of eighteen, and discovered in the Highlands in his own hand-writing.  The Highlander, his next heroic poem, was published in 1758.  Other verses, marked with his initials, were occasionally inserted in the Scots and Edinburgh

[page ix]

Magazines; and in a Collection of Original Poetry, by Blacklock and other Scots gentlemen, (Edinburgh 1760,) a series of anonymous poems must be appropriated to Macpherson.  These poems, of which some are highly descriptive, and others again sentimental, are authenticated by the repetition of the same expressions and imagery in Ossian; but at present, the chief value of Macpherson’s verses consists in the evidence which they afford, that his first, and most predominating ambition was to become a heroic poet.


Discussion Points

  1. With reference to the source, outline Malcolm Laing’s main reasons for believing that the poems were actually written by Macpherson himself, and not by an ancient poet.
  2. Malcolm Laing was an advocate. Is there anything in his approach to presenting his argument which would suggest this was his profession? Refer to the source to support your answer.
  • Previous
  • Next
  • Source 1
    Preface to ‘Fragments of ancient poetry’, 1760
  • Source 2
    Preface to ‘Fingal’, 1761
  • Source 3
    Letter from David Hume, 1763
  • Source 4
    Samuel Johnson’s opinion of the poems, 1775
  • Source 5
    An enquiry into the authenticity of the poems, 1781
  • Source 6
    ‘Poems of Ossian’ edited by Malcolm Laing, 1805
  • Source 7
    Highland Society of Scotland report, 1805

See the discussion points

National Library of Scotland logo

  • National Library of Scotland homepage
  • National Library of Scotland Learning Zone
  • Contact us

© 2019 National Library of Scotland