Download files
Individual page:
Thumbnail gallery: Grid view | List view
ii
PARA. |
PAGE. |
|||||
36. |
Assam: |
|||||
The wild growth existed before ganja shops were established |
21 |
|||||
37. |
The wild growth in the valleys |
ib. |
||||
38. |
The wild growth in the hills |
22 |
||||
39. |
The spontaneous growth must be regarded as wild |
ib. |
||||
40. |
Manipur |
ib. |
||||
41. |
North-Western Provinces: |
|||||
The official account of the wild growth |
23 |
|||||
42. |
The evidence corroborates the official account |
24 |
||||
43. |
Garhwal Tehri |
ib. |
||||
44. |
Rampur |
ib. |
||||
45. |
Punjab: |
|||||
Wild growth in the Himalayas and Terai |
ib. |
|||||
46. |
The limits of the submontane belt of wild growth |
25 |
||||
47. |
The supposed wild hemp of the Suleiman Range |
ib. |
||||
48. |
Spontaneous growth in the plain country |
26 |
||||
49. |
Area of wild growth defined |
ib. |
||||
50. |
Punjab States |
ib. |
||||
51. |
Central Provinces: |
|||||
The wild growth does not exist |
ib. |
|||||
52. |
Feudatory States |
27 |
||||
53. |
Madras: |
|||||
No official knowledge of wild growth |
ib. |
|||||
54. |
Evidence regarding the wild growth |
ib. |
||||
55. |
The chance growth of the Presidency is not wild |
28 |
||||
56. |
Travancore and Cochin |
ib. |
||||
57. |
Sondur, Banganapalle, and Pudukottai |
ib. |
||||
58. |
Bombay: |
|||||
There is no wild growth |
ib. |
|||||
59. |
Aden |
ib. |
||||
60. |
Kathiawar |
ib. |
||||
61. |
Cutch |
29 |
||||
62. |
Palanpur |
ib. |
||||
63. |
Mahi Kantha |
ib. |
||||
Rewa Kantha |
||||||
64. |
Kolhapur and Southern Maratha Country |
ib. |
||||
65. |
Various States |
ib. |
||||
66. |
Sind: |
|||||
The supposed wild hemp of the Baluch hills |
ib. |
|||||
67. |
No wild growth in the Indus Valley |
ib. |
||||
68. |
Khairpur |
30 |
||||
69. |
Berar |
ib. |
||||
70. |
Ajmere-Merwara |
ib. |
||||
71. |
Coorg |
ib. |
||||
72. |
Quetta-Pishin |
ib. |
||||
73. |
Burma: |
|||||
Absence of wild growth remarkable |
ib. |
|||||
74. |
Evidence regarding wild growth |
ib. |
||||
75. |
No wild growth in the settled districts, but probably exists in the |
|||||
northern mountain ranges |
31 |
|||||
76. |
Mysore |
ib. |
||||
77. |
Rajputana |
ib. |
||||
78. |
Central India |
32 |
||||
79. |
Hyderabad |
ib. |
||||
80. |
Baroda |
ib. |
||||
81 |
Kashmir |
ib. |
Set display mode to: Large image | Zoom image | Transcription
Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated.
India Papers > Medicine - Drugs > Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1894-1895 > Volume I > (3) Page ii |
---|
Permanent URL | https://digital.nls.uk/74574074 |
---|---|
Description | List of contents, cont. |
More information |
Description | [Volume 1]: Report. |
---|---|
Attribution and copyright: |
|
More information |