Download files
Complete book:
Individual page:
Thumbnail gallery: Grid view | List view
21
in former times called " Kirkmichael de Gemilstoun." He
cites, among other authorities, Chalmers Caledonia, vol.
xi., p. 533, and The Excheqtier Rolls of Scotland, vol. i.,
pp. 1 6, 152, and he conjectures that the progenitor of
this John de Gemilston was probably the first of the name
to settle in Scotland. . In the Exchequer Rolls, vol. i.,
p. 16, the spelling given is " Genilstoun." Mr. George
Neilson, LL.D., of Glasgow, who knows the district, has
pointed out to me that a curious misconception has crept
in, and that the name is neither " Gemilstoun," nor "Genil-
stoun," but " Gevelston,' - now pronounced Gelston. On
looking further into the authorities I find that at four
different places in the Calendar of Documents relating to
Scotland, viz., vol. ii., pages 172 and 198, and sections S24
and 834, the name is invariably given as " John de
Gevelston." In the Registmmi Magni Sigilli, under date
1st July, 145 1, the Crown Charter to the Church states that
it was gifted by " Sir John de Gevellestoun." In the
Ragman Rolls and Agnews Hereditary Sheriffs of
Galloivay, p. 111, the spelling is "John de Geuelston."
The u being an old form of v. For example, on the same
page there occur the names " Steuene," now spelt Steven,
and " Colueille," now Colville. I made numerous local
enquiries, but could find no trace of any early settlement
of Gemmills at Kirkmichael, and there seems no doubt
the name was " Gevelston," not " Gemilstoun."
in former times called " Kirkmichael de Gemilstoun." He
cites, among other authorities, Chalmers Caledonia, vol.
xi., p. 533, and The Excheqtier Rolls of Scotland, vol. i.,
pp. 1 6, 152, and he conjectures that the progenitor of
this John de Gemilston was probably the first of the name
to settle in Scotland. . In the Exchequer Rolls, vol. i.,
p. 16, the spelling given is " Genilstoun." Mr. George
Neilson, LL.D., of Glasgow, who knows the district, has
pointed out to me that a curious misconception has crept
in, and that the name is neither " Gemilstoun," nor "Genil-
stoun," but " Gevelston,' - now pronounced Gelston. On
looking further into the authorities I find that at four
different places in the Calendar of Documents relating to
Scotland, viz., vol. ii., pages 172 and 198, and sections S24
and 834, the name is invariably given as " John de
Gevelston." In the Registmmi Magni Sigilli, under date
1st July, 145 1, the Crown Charter to the Church states that
it was gifted by " Sir John de Gevellestoun." In the
Ragman Rolls and Agnews Hereditary Sheriffs of
Galloivay, p. 111, the spelling is "John de Geuelston."
The u being an old form of v. For example, on the same
page there occur the names " Steuene," now spelt Steven,
and " Colueille," now Colville. I made numerous local
enquiries, but could find no trace of any early settlement
of Gemmills at Kirkmichael, and there seems no doubt
the name was " Gevelston," not " Gemilstoun."
Set display mode to: Universal Viewer | Mirador | Large image | Transcription
Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated.
Histories of Scottish families > Notes on the probable origin of the name Gemmill or Gemmell > (25) Page 21 |
---|
Permanent URL | https://digital.nls.uk/95561297 |
---|
Description | A selection of almost 400 printed items relating to the history of Scottish families, mostly dating from the 19th and early 20th centuries. Includes memoirs, genealogies and clan histories, with a few produced by emigrant families. The earliest family history goes back to AD 916. |
---|