Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (9) [Page iii][Page iii]Preface

(11) next ››› Divisional title pageDivisional title pageCassilis peerage, 1760-4

(10) Page iv -
IV
being the opinion of this House, that as the
said dignity might have been granted by let-
ters patent to the grantee and a series of heirs,
not so comprehensive as to carry the said
dignity to such heirs as the claimants respec-
tively represent themselves to be, it ought,
according to law, to be presumed that the
same was not granted to such heirs ; and it
appears to this House that the said dignity
has not been in fact assumed or enjoyed since
the death of Robert Baron of Roxburghe
without heirs-male of his body begotten, by
any heir or heirs of the said Robert Baron
Roxburghe."
Accident having put the Editor in posses-
sion of authentic copies of the speeches de-
livered in the cases of Cassillis, Sutherland,
and Glencairn, and of such notes as had been
preserved of the observations of Lord Mans-
field on moving the resolutions in the claim
to the Barony of Spynie, he was induced to
preserve them in this shape, and to print for
private circulation a volume, which, it is hop-
ed, will not be unacceptable to those who take
an interest in Peerage Law.
J. M.
10, Forres Street, 10th Dec. 1839.

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence