Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (194) Page 166Page 166

(196) next ››› Page 168Page 168

(195) Page 167 -
STRATHERN, MONTEITH, AND AIRTH. 167
Mr. Knight Bruce. — " Lord Eldon thus ex- Proceedings
N -i»/r-riT '^^ '■'"^ House
presses himself (p. 8.): — ' My Lords, 1 am as of Lords.
little a friend, upon principle, as any body can be, ' " ^'
to the notion of construing the meaning of one Knight Bruce.
deed by ascertaining what is the meaning of an-
other, more especially if the purpose of the
latter deed be to alter the effect of the former ;
but still it is necessary to state to your Lord-
ships the history of the titles, for two reasons :
First, because I do apprehend it is perfectly
competent to every Court of Justice, when it is
construing an instrument, to look at other instru-
ments, with a view to determine what is the
language and style, and what is the phrase of
the law, or of those who are conversant with the
law.'
" There are not many passages with which it
will be necessary to trouble your lordships. At
page 48. Lord Eldon thus expresses himself: —
' If you shall be disposed to adopt that rea-
soning, we come next to consider who is that
heir ? or who are those heirs of tailzie, that are
mentioned in this clause of destination ? and it
becomes necessary for me here to read that
clause once more to your Lordships. But, be-
fore T do so, I wish, if your Lordships would
permit me, to request you always to recollect,
that when you are construing such a clause as
this, you are applying yourselves to the deter-
mination of a question which may depend upon
M 4

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence