Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (81) Page 53Page 53

(83) next ››› Page 55Page 55

(82) Page 54 -
54" HISTORY OF THE EARLDOMS
William acknowledging any subject to be equal in blood
SEVENTH Earl , . m,, i
OF MoNTEiTH. to himselt. '
It is impossible to attach due weight to those
Propositions and to the Answers to them, with-
out bearing in mind that the status of King
Robert the Second's children by Elizabeth Muir
was then a matter of extreme dehcacy. The
learned triumvirate, by asserting that King
Robert's marriage with Euphemia Ross was his
first marriage, shewed their disbelief of his pre-
vious marriage with Elizabeth Muir, and thus
threw great doubt on the right, by birth, of His
Majesty's ancestor. King j^obert the Third, to
the Throne.
The expression " equal in blood" seems to
have been used in an equivocal sense, and its
true meaning would rather appear to be *' supe-
rior in blood," because all the descendants (who
were then very numerous) of any child of King
Robert the Second, or of the child of any sub-
sequent King of Scotland, were *' equal in
blood" to King Charles the First, though no
jealousy was felt respecting their descent from
the Blood Royal. Unless, however. King Ro-
bert the Second's issue by Elizabeth Muir were
illegitimate, or ought to have been postponed in
the succession to his children by Euphemia
1 Sir John Scot's " True Relation," Appendix, No. IX.
pp. xxxiii.xxxiv.

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence