Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (91) [Page 83][Page 83]

(93) next ››› [Page 85][Page 85]

(92) [Page 84] -
OF THE
mm, foj tn fo coingfce tefttfetSj fo confeffeltfmfelfe
te bg a Cfoiftian, anD to|>at tstf)atelfe,batagtt
tereco&atDi^ fotefufeCtetft*
! ^ ^ti. Is it enough to receauc them both once on-
ly in ourlyfetymc?
e. fSapttfme foais oz&aineb to bereceafcefcbut
6nce:tD|ieref0;e ttt0 notlalDfaìltobebapUieDagatne
bnf tt t0 otljerUHfe to be tì)tmg$t of tH $tippec»
u (, y^/. Whatisthereafonthereof?
C. Wy 15aptifme #$2D Dotij bjing, ana xt*
ttmt fcs mto ^ta C^nrcfc, ana to&en fc® ^atij once
meatjco M, %& Deciaietfc alfo to t)* bp t^e ^upper,
t^t ^ae fetlì feDe ts contmoall^.
I v HT'O whom belongeth the mìniftration
. / J. of Raptifme, and the Lords 5'upptr? ,
C. <Hntù tfeem Mo iiaae tfje c|acge to p*eac&
t$rt iv tn ttie C&urcti: foj t^e p^eaclnng of <§*i>£D&
t&HojD, anfc mtnìffratitm of tlie jaacraments Um
tUm* torntl^ belonging to one fesnfc of offtce.
\'i>S UW' 1$ thtre not a proofe for this to bee
brought out of Scripture?
C. £Pur. llujD stbetf? fpedall cfmtge jta W* £tpo#
fil^, as iueii to bapttfc as to p^&cfj: mn as tou*
iwtng ttje Smppcr, fce gi.lj£tt> tljem tmunction tè fol*
loto fci* enfample fceto $a,$fa t be patt ef a ^intff e|
int^at^esatiett tontoctt'erg.
CU. The Paftors ( who bte the Mimfters of
-^e Sacraments) ought they ro receaue indiffc-
itty every perfon tfoat covnmettr? Jl
^. #<$ tducfrng Bapttfme fojfomticb mtMtm
■ one tn onr tytite h^Ù^ btit ituie c&i&jen,-
1 U^tS

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence