‹‹‹ prev (48)

(50) next ›››

(49)
47
ered to be one-sixth part of the Inhabitants, rtiak-
g the whole amount to more than 12000.
After that dreadful calamity, and especially after
he withdrawing of Cromwell's troops, a very great
iminution of the inhabitants was too evidently ob-
erved. The loss of the shipping, and consequent
ecay of trade, the long famine which ensued to-
ards the end of that century, hurt the town so
nuch, that the decrease of the inhabitants conti-
nued. In the reign of Charles II. there was a po-
lulation only of 7172, being a deficiency of 875 ;
tnd during the short reign of James II. about the
fear 1786 or 7, there was a still farther deficiency
bf 1420, leaving only 6627 inhabitants in a place
vhich, in less than half a century before, had been
;o flourishing.
It must, however, be observed, that the above
lumbers are deduced from a calculation on the
fnarriages v/hich happened during the several pe-
iods, as there was no written record or document.
[t is well known that after the union of the sister
kingdoms, the trade of Dundee was severely hurt,
whatever may have been the general benefit aris-
ng from that event. The staple commodity of the
xade was then coarse woollen, called plaiding,
which was exported to the continent ; but, by the
loss of the privileges of a free trade with France
and Holland, the whole business was completely
mined. This, of course, greatly injured the popu-
lation, as persons were obliged to remove to those
Iplaces where they could find employment for them-
elves and bread to their families.
The population continued to languish for along

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence