Skip to main content

‹‹‹ prev (192)

(194) next ›››

(193)
103
belwcen the deluge and the publication oi" tlic Pcntatcucii,
this, as well as the sister dialects, must have undergone some
accidental, and some necessary changes, and a considerable
degree of artiíìeial cultivation; yet the simplicity and com-
prehension of its principles, the regularity ot" its structure, and
above all, the venerable aiul unrivalled antiipiity of that
volume in which it is preserved, seem to give it a decided
superiority over either ot" the odiers. W'e know what the
Hebrew ^\ as 3300 years ago, and can make out its claim to an
antiquity still higher. Though it cannot safely be pronounced
to have been the p}-imitivc language, yet it must be received as
ii dialect of this language, and as a most respectable scale to
iipprceiate the character of every dialect v, hatsoevcr.
7. From these observations may be demonstraii-d tlic
absolute error of a general principle, laiti doAvn by some"
eminent philologists. It has been observed that the languages
of savage nations generally consist of very long words and
\ibound with vowels; and hence it has been contended, that
such was the original character of all languages. The
Hebrew, Chaldaic, Syriae and Arabic roots are remarkably
s'lmpk, short, and strong. The long vocal terms of savages
are not then characteristical of the inlancy, but of the decay
and ruin of language. Man was not uatiirnili/, \\οΐ originalhj
a savage.

Images and transcriptions on this page, including medium image downloads, may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence unless otherwise stated. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence