Transcription
A Full and Particular Account of the Trial and Sentence of James Anderson and David Glenn, who are to be Executed at the spot where the crime war committed, on Friday, the 12th December 1823, for the Murder of John M'Clure, and their bodies to be given for Dissection. BEFORE the High Court of Justiciary, at Edinburgh, on Wed- nesday the 5th November 1823, JAMES ANDERSON, DA- VID GLENN, MARGARET FREW, and MARGARET AN- DERSON, were indicted for Murder, in having, on the 6th day of July last, attacked John M'Clure, on the road leading from the town of Ayr to the village of Ochiltree, and beat and kicked him in such a manner as to occasion his death a few hours after. To which they pled Not Guilty. Thomas Young, a student, who left Ochiltree in company with the deceased Mr John M'Clure, and who was attacked on the road at the same time with him, by the prisoners, described, at consider able length, the circumstances of the attack. They gave no provo cation whatever. They appeared to be intoxicated, and witness and M'Clure did not even speak to them before they attacked them His evidence was corroborated by that of James Bryden, another student, and of James Tod, merchant, Ayr, who passed them at the time in a car or gig, and who on seeing them attacked, stopped the gig and eame to their assistance, M'Clure was struck, kicked, and terribly abused, and Bryden says, in the last attack M'Clure was standing on the side of the road, holding his umbrella before him, when Anderson ran in upon him, and knocked him down a- gain. M'Clure called out, " O ! man, let me alone, I can do no more, and you have done enough." He was ultimately got into . the gig and taken home, and died in two hours after. After the ex- amination of several witnesses, the pannels' declarations were read in which they stated that they had been drinking in the toll-house, and were much intoxicated. Some had a confused recollection of the affray on the road, and others said that they recollected no- thing'at all about it. John Hunter, keeper of the toll-bar at Holm- ston, near where the assault took place, was then examined, in ex- calpation, but his evidence brought out nothing in favour of the ac- cused, but rather tended to confirm several parts of the evidence for the prosecution. The Lord Advocate addressed the Jury for the Crown, at consi- derable length, and stated, that this case was to have been tried at. the Ayr Circuit, but, from an accidendtal error in the indictment, it had been certified to this court; and he was glad it had taken, place' here, where no local feelings could interfere with the investigation.' His Lordship concluded by saying, that the evidence.warranted' him in asking from them a verdict of murder against all the prison- ers. He was followed by Mr Napier for the prisoners, who insist- ed on the possibility of the death of M'Clure being occasioned by apoplexy, brought on by agitation and exertion on the unlucky oc- casion. After which the Lord Justice Clerk summed up the evidence, At great length, and decidedly expressed his own opinion, that the crime of murder had been proved against the male prisoners, The Jury, in twenty minutes, returned an unanimous verdict, finding James Anderson and David Glenn Guilty of the crime, libelled ; but in consequence of the murder not having been premeditated, recom- mended them to mercy; and the libel Not Proven against the fe- male prisoners. The women, after a solemn advice from the Lord Justice Clerk, were dismissed from the bar. . After a few observations from Lord-Picmilly. in which Lord Meadowbank entirely concurred, the Lord Justice Clerk then said, in performing the painful duty which now devolved on him,he did not wish to say any thing to aggravate those feelings, with which, by their demeanour, the prisoners seemed to have been impressed throughout this investigation ; but it was incumbent him to warn them to adopt that line of conduct which would be most for their interest, both in this world, and that, to come, whatever might be the issue of this day's proceedings. The recommendation of the Jury, and the ground of it, would be forwarded to the proper quar- ter ; but he advised them not to trust to its success ; for, in consi- dering that recommendation, the whole of the case would be taken into view; and he thought it his duty not to hold our to them any flattering hopes that might not be realized. On the contrary, he implored them to consider themselves as on the brink of eternity. If their repentance was sincere, mercy was promised to the chief of sinners; but if they remained hardened a more dreadful day of ; reckoning awaited them. Even if their lives should be spared, it would be incumbent on them to follow a new course of life, and by their future good conduct, to redeem the past. The sentence of the Court was, that they should be removed from the Jail of Edinburgh, on the 17th of November, and transmitted to the Jail of Ayr; from whence they should be taken to such place as the Magistrates might appoint, on Friday the 12th day of December next, and there public- ly execn ed, and their bodies given to Dr Munro for dissection.
View Commentary | Download PDF Facsimile
|
|
Date of publication:
1823 shelfmark: F.3.a.13(60)
View larger image
|